Skip to main content

"Could Care Less" vs. "Couldn't Care Less"

It is astounding the number of people who use the phrase "I could care less." Little do they know, they are saying the exact opposite of what they mean. If they really stop to think about it, they want to get across the point that they could NOT care less. In fact, they care so little that it isn't possible to be more indifferent.

Incorrect: could care less
Correct: couldn't care less

Comments

  1. This is another "nit-picky" post with the author over thinking the phrases. According to the Oxford English Dictionary(OED), couldn't care less and could care less mean exactly the same thing. Both are fairly new phrases in literature with "couldn't care less" appearing in 1946 and "could care less" appearing in 1966. Here are the entries of "couldn't care less"(d) and "could care less"(e) from the OED under the word "care":

    (d) Colloq. phr. (I, etc.) "couldn't care less" : (I am, etc.) completely uninterested, utterly indifferent; freq. as phr. used attrib. Hence couldn't-care-less-ness.

    1946 A. Phelps (title) ‘I couldn't care less.’
    1947 B. Marshall Red Danube vi. 53 The couldn't-care-less boys, the chaps who imagined that now that the war was over there was no need for further effort.
    1947 People 22 June 2/4 If I suggest that it should be good because the book was by a top-line author she simply couldn't care less.
    1955 Ess. in Crit. 5 76 Exhibiting a vulgar couldn't-carelessness.
    1957 F. King Man on Rock iv. 120 The phrase he most used was ‘I couldn't care less’: which seemed to sum up his character.
    1965 Times Lit Suppl. 25 Nov. 1083/1 The couldn't-care-less attitude of people with little to lose.

    (e) U.S. colloq. phr. (I, etc.) could care less = sense (c) above, with omission of negative.

    1966 Seattle Post-Intelligencer 1 Nov. 21/2 My husband is a lethargic, indecisive guy who drifts along from day to day. If a bill doesn't get paid he could care less.
    1973 Washington Post 5 Jan. b1/1 A few crusty-souled Republican senators who could care less about symbolic rewards.
    1978 J. Carroll Mortal Friends iii. iii. 281 ‘I hate sneaking past your servants in the morning.’ ‘They know, anyway. They could care less. Thornton mistreats them horribly.’

    So both are CORRECT and have the same sense according to the definitive English Dictionary in the world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think I'll side with common sense over OED.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Whole Nother

"A whole nother" is a commonly used phrase. It is a habit that people don't even realize they are doing. The following is an example of the phrase being used in a sentence: She is living in a whole nother world. "Nother" is not a word. To correct this error, you could use "another," "a whole other," "a completely different," "an entirely different," etc. Correct sentences: She is living in an entirely different world. She is living in another world.

The Plural Form of "Rendezvous"

What, you may ask, is the plural form of the word "Rendezvous?" It is actually the same as the singular form--no extra "s" or apostrophe necessary. The distinction is in the pronunciation. When using the singular form, you do not pronounce the "s" at the end; it is silent. To pluralize it, you simply pronounce the "s." Singular: Rendezvous ( rän-di- vü) Plural: Rendezvous ( rän-di- vüz )

Is "themself" correct?

I hear many people these days on TV and radio using "themself." So why are they using it and what are they trying to communicate? Let's think about it logically. "Self" refers to one person. When you're using "them," you're talking about multiple people, not just one person. Some people are using the term "themself" as a way to get around unknown gender without having to say a mouthful like "himself or herself." However, "themself" is not correct. For example, someone might say, "A person can find themself in a precarious situation very quickly." The grammatically correct way to say this is, "A person can find himself or herself in a precarious situation very quickly." Also, "hisself" is not correct. I have heard this one many times too. I think this is really just a result of lazy speech. Swallowing that "m" is somewhat easier. However, it is not a word. Correct: the